Cedrus Atlantica - Sociedade de Capital de Risco, S.A. ("Cedrus" or "Company") as a management company is obliged to clarify and analyze the questions and complaints of the participants of its collective investment undertakings ("CIUs").
The Company adopts this policy, which contains adequate, effective and transparent procedures for the appropriate and prompt handling of complaints it may receive from its participants.
This policy applies to all employees of the Company, including members of the Board of Directors.
In the context of the treatment of complaints from its participants, the Company must guide its actions to fully comply with a set of guiding principles, specifically:
The Company guarantees that all Employees involved in the handling of complaints are aware of this policy and that they are aware of the need to comply with the duty of secrecy and confidentiality imposed on them.
The reception and handling of complaints is the direct responsibility of the Compliance officer, who is also responsible for preparing a proposal for a response to the complainant, to be approved by the Board of Directors, as well as archiving the entire process.
The Management Company has the necessary, adequate and sufficient means for the adequate and prompt handling of complaints submitted to it by its participants, also ensuring the existence of a detailed procedure for the reception, treatment and resolution of complaints received, described in the following points.
The Firm provides on its website a set of means through which its retail investors can submit a claim, specifically:
At the marketing stage of its UCITS, the Company informs its investors of the existence of:
The management and treatment of complaint processes is ensured by the Compliance Officer, except in cases where the complaint concerns him/her, in which case it will be sent directly to the Board of Directors, which will carry out the respective analysis and follow-up of the process.
The receipt of any complaint through these means always leads to the creation of an internal process number and respective registration in an existing computer file for this purpose.
To ensure the competent and adequate handling of complaints, the Compliance Officer must ensure that the complaint sent contains the information necessary for its analysis, namely, verifying that it contains, at least, the following elements:
In cases where the complaints submitted do not contain the information described above, the Compliance Officer must contact the investor to complete the data and/or iinformation, indicating the maximum period for this purpose, as well as a warning that non-compliance will lead to the filing of the process. Ager the deadline has passed without the investor having responded or completed the request, the Compliance Officer archives the process and informs the participant by email.
Once the completeness of the complaint is verified, the Compliance Officer prepares a written analysis, which includes:
At the end of its analysis, the Compliance Officer sends it for validation by the Board of Directors.
Ager validation of the response proposal by the Board of Directors, the Compliance Officer prepares a response to the investor, which must contain the following elements:
The process is finalized with the submission of the final response to the investor.
As soon as the response is sent to the investor, the Compliance Officer ensures that all elements related to the complaint are properly filed in a digital folder created for this purpose, with all the relevant elements, thus closing the process.
As a rule, responses to complaints submitted by customers are sent within a maximum period of 10 (ten) working days, counted from the receipt of the same.
In cases of special complexity or in which it has been necessary to request additional elements from the investor, the Company must seek to complete the processes within a maximum period of 20 (twenty) business days.
Whenever it is not possible to comply with the above-mentioned deadlines, the Company must contact the investor, explaining the reason for the delay in sending the response.
This policy is reviewed annually or at shorter intervals whenever necessary.